This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified professional before making any decisions about the use of AI in your law firm.

---

How Can I Identify and Manage Shadow AI in My Legal Practice?

Unauthorised AI use – often called "shadow AI" – is when your employees use AI tools without your firm's knowledge or approval. It is already happening in your law firm, and if you think it is not, you are dangerously naive. Your lawyers are using it, your paralegals are using it, and your support staff are using it. The question is, what are you going to do about it?

Ignoring unsanctioned AI use is not a strategy; it is an abdication of your responsibility to protect your clients and your firm. Every time a lawyer pastes a clause from a client's contract into a free online grammar checker, or uses a public AI tool to summarise a deposition, you are facing a potential data breach, a violation of client confidentiality, and a regulatory nightmare.

Why is Unauthorised AI Use So Prevalent?

This uncontrolled AI adoption is not born from malicious intent. It is born from a desire for efficiency. Your people are under pressure to deliver more, faster. They see a tool that can help them do their job better, and they use it. They are not thinking about the SRA, the ICO, or the EU AI Act. They are thinking about meeting their deadlines.

The problem is that the tools they are using are often the free, public versions of AI models. These tools are not designed for enterprise use. They are designed to collect data. And that data is your client's confidential information.

The Risks of Unmanaged AI Use

The risks of unsanctioned AI tools are not theoretical. They are real, and they are significant.

Risk	Description
Confidentiality Breaches	Inputting client data into public AI models is a direct violation of your duty of confidentiality. It is that simple.
Data Security	Public AI tools are a prime target for cybercriminals. A data breach at one of these providers could expose your clients' most sensitive information.
Inaccurate Information	As we have seen time and time again, AI can and does produce inaccurate and even fabricated information. If your lawyers are relying on this information without verification, you are exposed to professional negligence claims.
Regulatory Action	The SRA, the ICO, and other regulators are taking a keen interest in the use of AI. A significant incident involving unapproved AI could lead to fines, sanctions, and reputational damage.
Loss of Control	If you do not know what AI tools are being used in your firm, you have no control over the data, the outputs, or the risks. You are flying blind.

A Practical Guide to Managing Unauthorised AI

You cannot eliminate unsanctioned AI use entirely. But you can manage it. Here is a practical, four-step approach:

1. Discover: See the Unseen

You cannot manage what you cannot see. You need to get a handle on what AI tools are being used in your firm right now. This involves:

• Technical Discovery: Using network monitoring and endpoint detection tools to identify traffic to known AI services.
• Human Discovery: Surveying your staff to understand what tools they are using and why. Anonymity is key here; you want honest answers, not fear-driven denials.

2. Assess: Triage the Risk

Once you have a list of the AI tools being used, you need to assess the risk of each one. Create a simple risk matrix:

• High-Risk: Public, free AI tools with no data privacy guarantees (e.g., the free version of ChatGPT). These should be blocked immediately.
• Medium-Risk: Tools with enterprise-grade security but no formal firm-wide governance (e.g., a lawyer using their personal ChatGPT Plus account for work).
• Low-Risk: Firm-sanctioned, governed AI tools with robust security and data privacy controls.

3. Govern: Provide a Safe Alternative

The most effective way to combat unauthorised AI use is to provide a safe, sanctioned alternative. If your lawyers have access to a powerful, secure, and easy-to-use AI tool that is approved by the firm, they are far less likely to go rogue.

This is where your AI Acceptable Use Policy comes in. It should clearly state which tools are approved, what they can be used for, and what the rules of engagement are.

4. Educate: Build a Culture of Awareness

Technology alone is not the answer. You need to build a culture of awareness around the risks of AI. This means training your people on:

• The firm's AI policy.
• The risks of using unauthorised AI tools.
• How to use the firm-sanctioned AI tools safely and effectively.

The Bottom Line: Unauthorised AI is a Symptom, Not the Disease

Unsanctioned AI use is a symptom of a deeper problem: a disconnect between the needs of your people and the tools you provide them.

If you want to get serious about managing this risk, you need to get serious about your firm's AI strategy. You need to understand what your people need, you need to provide them with the right tools, and you need to give them the training and support they need to use those tools responsibly.

Ignoring unauthorised AI use is a choice. It is a choice to accept the risks, to gamble with your clients' data, and to hope for the best. And in the legal profession, hope is not a strategy.

---

Take the Next Step

If you are ready to move from theory to action, I can help. My AI Audit gives you a comprehensive assessment of your firm's AI readiness, identifying the gaps in your governance, the risks in your current tooling, and a clear roadmap to get you where you need to be.

Book a Discovery Call → or learn more about the AI Audit.